Disposed

Kamla Devi @ Kusum v. State

Rajasthan HC28 Oct 2021CRLMP/5891/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Held the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur. Justice Vinit Kumar Mathur refused to label the petitioners' relationship as the cause for threats but directed the petitioners to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Bhilwara, to seek safety measures from family members opposed to their relationship.

What did the court decide?

Direct the superintendent of police, bhilwara to hear the grievance and take appropriate steps for safety of the petitioners.

Kamla Devi @ Kusum Vs State — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 5891/2021

¶3

Smt. Kamla Devi @ Kusum D/o Balu Ram, Aged About 22 Years, B/c Kumawat, R/o Ward No.06, Teh. Raypur, Dist. Bhilwara.

¶4

Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Raju Ram Banjara, Aged About 30 Years, B/c Banjara, R/o Village Amartiya, Teh. And Dist. Rajsamand.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Raajsthan, through The Secretary Dept. Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

Superintendent Of Police, Bhilwara.

¶9

The SHO Police Station Raypur, Dist. Bhilwara.

¶10

Balu Ram S/o Ramchandra Kumawat, B/c Kumawat, R/o Ward No. 06, Tehsil Raypur, Dist. Bhilwara.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Moti Singh
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. S. K. Bhati,PP

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶14

Order

¶15

28/10/2021

¶16

Defects pointed out by the office is over ruled.

¶17

The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground that the petitioners who being major are living in the company of each other but the company of the petitioners is not palatable to the relatives of the petitioner No.1 i.e. respondent No.4 & other family members and they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at their hands.

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CRLMP-5891/2021]

¶20

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on an overall consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that nobody can be permitted to take law in his own hands merely because the petitioners being major are living in the company of each other. Thus, this Court deems it proper to direct the petitioners to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Bhilwara who shall hear the grievance of the petitioners and take appropriate steps for safety and security of the petitioners as they are apprehending untoward incident at the hands of respondent No.4 as well as other family members of the petitioner No. 1.

¶21

Consequently, the present misc. petition stands disposed of by issuing direction to the Superintendent of Police, Bhilwara to take appropriate steps for safety and security of the petitioners at the hands of those, who are opposed to their relationship.

¶22

It is made clear that this order is not a proof of age of the petitioners and any observations in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners at the instances of their relatives.

¶23

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶24

21-SunilS/-

Kamla Devi @ Kusum v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamla Devi @ Kusum v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayesh Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Suchita Pokhrana Vs State

Pankaj Mathur Vs State

Urvi Shrimali Vs State

Khushboo Vs State

Parvindra Kaur Vs State