Disposed

Parvindra Kaur v. State

Rajasthan HC28 Oct 2021CRLMP/5895/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Rajasthan directed the Superintendent of Police, Hanumangarh, to hear the petitioners' grievances and take safety steps against threats from family members opposing their relationship, while explicitly stating the order does not prove the petitioners' age.

What did the court decide?

Directions issued to the Superintendent of Police, Hanumangarh to hear petitioners' grievance and take appropriate steps for their safety and security.

Parvindra Kaur Vs State — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 5895/2021

¶3

Parvindra Kaur D/o Sh. Hardev Singh, Aged About 31 Years,R/o Ward No. 05, Shri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.

¶4

Gulab Singh S/o Sh. Gurdev Singh, Aged About 37 Years,R/o Ward No. 12, Near Water Works, Chauhilawali, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State, Through The Secretary, Dept. Of Home And Affairs, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Jaipur.

¶9

The Superintendent Of Police, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Tej Singh Badgujar for Mr. Vinod Choudhary
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. S.K. Bhati,PP

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶13

Order

¶14

28/10/2021

¶15

The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground that the petitioners who being major are living in the company of each other but the company of the petitioners is not palatable to the relatives of the petitioner No.1 and they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at their hands.

¶16

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on an overall consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case,

¶17

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-5895/2021]

¶18

this Court is of the view that nobody can be permitted to take law in his own hands merely because the petitioners being major are living in the company of each other. Thus, this Court deems it proper to direct the petitioners to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Hanumangarh who shall hear the grievance of the petitioners and take appropriate steps for safety and security of the petitioners as they are apprehending untoward incident at the hands of family members of the petitioner No.1.

¶19

Consequently, the present misc. petition stands disposed of by issuing direction to the Superintendent of Police, Hanumangarh to take appropriate steps for safety and security of the petitioners at the hands of those, who are opposed to their relationship.

¶20

It is made clear that this order is not a proof of age of the petitioners and any observations in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners at the instances of their relatives.

¶21

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶22

15-/Vivek/-

Parvindra Kaur v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parvindra Kaur v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayesh Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Suchita Pokhrana Vs State

Pankaj Mathur Vs State

Urvi Shrimali Vs State

Khushboo Vs State

Kamla Devi @ Kusum Vs State