Disposed

Priyanka v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Sept 2021CRLMP/4831/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hearing a bail petition filed to obtain security and protection directions against threats to life and liberty, the High Court directed petitioners to appear before the SHO with representation for grievance analysis, leaving security decisions to the police based on threat perception.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed; petitioners directed to appear before SHO with representation; SHO authorized to analyze threat and order security if necessary.

Priyanka Vs State of Rajasthan — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 4831/2021

¶3

Priyanka D/o Shri Mangeram W/o Shri Balram, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Poharka, Teh. Rawatsar District Hanumangarh (Raj.)

¶4

Indarpal S/o Shri Nihal Singh, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 19 Adarsh Colony, Teh. Nohar District Hanumangarh (Raj.)

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶8

Superintendent Of Police, Hanumangarh.

¶9

Sho, Police Station Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh.

¶10

Mangeram S/o Jhindu Ram, Village Barwali, Teh. Nohar District Hanumangarh (Raj.)

¶11

Balram S/o Shri Manglaram, Resident Of Poharka, Teh. Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.)

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Natwar Lal
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Mahipal Bishnoi PP

¶14

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶15

Order

¶16

Reserved on 09/09/2021 Pronounced on 18/09/2021

¶17

In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of all concerned.

¶18

The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[CRLMP-4831/2021]

¶21

and protection to the petitioners on the ground that they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that Article 21 of the Constitution of India provides for right to life and personal liberty under the ambit of fundamental rights and any threat to the same amounts to violation of the same.

¶23

After hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as perusing the record of the case, this Court disposes of the present petition with the direction to the petitioners to appear before the Station House Officer, Police Station, Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh alongwith appropriate representation regarding their grievance. The Station House Officer, Police Station, Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh shall in turn hear the grievance of the petitioners, and after analyzing the threat perceptions, if necessitated, may pass necessary orders to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners.

¶24

It is made clear that any observation in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners.

¶25

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

¶26

SKant/-

Priyanka v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Priyanka v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nirmal Deora Vs State of Rajasthan

Ranjeet Singh @ Jitu Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohd. Ramjan Vs State

Jagdish Kumar Jingar Vs State

Navalram Vs State

Jagdish Kumar Jingar Vs State