Disposed

Hadman Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC25 Jan 2021CRLMP/412/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought quashing of an FIR regarding a dispute over a way with pending civil proceedings. The Court, satisfied by the Public Prosecutor's assurance of fair consideration of a representation within 15 days, adjourned and disposed of the petition, allowing the petitioner to approach the Court again if necessary.

What did the court decide?

Direction to investigating authority to consider petitioner's representation within 15 days before completing investigation; petition disposed with liberty to approach Court again.

Hadman Ram Vs State of Rajasthan — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 412/2021

¶3

Hadman Ram S/o Sh. Poona Ram, Aged About 50 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Kukarda, Asop, Tehsil Bhopalgarh, District Jodhpur.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

Subhash S/o Sh. Ramniwas Jat, Kukarda, Asop, Tehsil Bhopalgarh, District Jodhpur.

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Anil Parihar
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Shrawan Vishnoi,PP

¶10

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶11

Order

¶12

25/01/2021

¶13

In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

¶14

The instant misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking quashing of the F.I.R. No.86/2020 lodged at P.S. Asop, District Jodhpur.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute in question is pertaining to a way for which the civil proceedings are going on. Learned counsel for the petitioner has shown the documents reflecting civil proceedings.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that the petitioner wants to submit a representation alongwith all

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMP-412/2021]

¶19

the relevant documents before the concerned investigating authority to redress the issue.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that if the petitioner submits a representation along with all the necessary documents before the concerned investigating authority within a period of fifteen days from today, then the same shall be considered and decided strictly in accordance with law, before completing the investigation.

¶21

In light of the aforesaid assurance given by learned Public Prosecutor, the present misc. petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned investigating authority that in case the petitioner submits a representation along with all the necessary documents before it within a period of fifteen days from today, then the same shall be considered and decided before completing the investigation, strictly in accordance with law and as per the assurance given by the learned Public Prosecutor. The petitioner shall be at liberty to approach this Court again, in case need arises.

¶22

The stay petition also stands disposed of.

¶23

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

¶24

288-SPhophalia/Jitender-

Hadman Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hadman Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tamanna Kothari Vs State

Sukhchain Sukha Vs State of Rajasthan

M/S Vishal Engineering Vs Riico and Anr.

Vijendra Singh Narwal Vs Sumer Singh Saini

Shaitan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Prem Lal Vs State