Disposed

Tamanna Kothari v. State

Rajasthan HC22 Jan 2021CRLMP/529/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of a criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. directing petitioners to report to the SHO to verify threat perceptions and secure protection, clarifying it does not affect pending criminal or civil proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioners to approach SHO Mangalwad for grievance regarding security threat; SHO to analyze threat and pass orders if needed.

Tamanna Kothari Vs State — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 529/2021

¶3

Tamanna Kothari D/o Sh. Deepak Kothari (Jain), Aged About 22 Years, Sadar Bazar, Dhariyawad, District Pratapgarh.

¶4

Ritik Kikawat (Jain) S/o Sh. Suresh Kikawat (Jain), Aged About 20 Years, Hanuman Circle, Dhariyawad, District Pratapgarh.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State, Through P.p.

¶8

Superintendent Of Police, Chittorgarh.

¶9

Superintendent Of Police, Pratapgarh.

¶10

S.h.o., P.s. Mangalwad, District Chittorgarh. 5. Dinesh Kumar S/o Gopi Lal Jain, Mangalwad, District Chittorgarh.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr.Manish Pitaliya.
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr.Farzand Ali, AAG a/w Mr.Laxman Solanki,PP.

¶13

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶14

Order

¶15

22/01/2021

¶16

In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

¶17

The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground that they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CRLMP-529/2021]

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Article 21 of the Constitution of India provides for right to life and personal liberty under the ambit of fundamental rights and any threat to the same amounts to violation of the same.

¶21

After hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as perusing the record of the case, this Court disposes of the present petition with the direction to the petitioners to appear before the Station House Officer, Police Station Mangalwad, District Chittorgarh alongwith appropriate representation regarding their grievance. The Station House Officer, Police Station Mangalwad, District Chittorgarh shall in turn hear the grievance of the petitioners, and after analyzing the threat perceptions, if necessitated, may pass necessary orders to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners.

¶22

It is made clear that any observation in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners.

¶23

Stay petition also stands disposed of.

¶24

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

¶25

334-SPhophalia/Jitender/-

Tamanna Kothari v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tamanna Kothari v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinod Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Suman Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Kavita Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhanwar Lal Vs State

Kishan Lal Kishan Das Vs State