Vijendra Singh Narwal v. Sumer Singh Saini
Case brief
What is this about?
This single-judge order stays the execution of the arrest warrant for three weeks to allow the petitioner to surrender and apply for bail. The trial court is directed to decide the bail application independently.
What did the court decide?
Warrant of arrest kept in abeyance for three weeks; petitioner allowed to surrender and apply for bail.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 36/2021
Vijendra Singh Narwal S/o Sh. Thana Ram, Aged About 55 Years, B/c Jat, R/o Village Rithal, P.s. Rohtak Sadar, Tehsil And District Rohtak (Haryana).
----Petitioner
Versus
Sumer Singh Saini S/o Sh. Dalu Ram Saini, R/o Ward No. 18, Taranagar, Tehsil Taranagar District Churu.
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. RS Choudhary |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Sharwan Bishnoi,PP |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
25/01/2021
- In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the warrant of arrest against the petitioner can be kept in abeyance to enable surrender and bail application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vijendra Singh Narwal
- respondent
Sumer Singh Saini
Coram
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMP/36/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court