Umeda Ram v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
A special criminal miscellaneous petition was dismissed as infructuous because the chargesheet in the underlying matter had already been filed.
A special criminal miscellaneous petition was dismissed as infructuous because the chargesheet in the underlying matter had already been filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1272/2021
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kaushal Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arun Kumar, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
21/10/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the chargesheet in the case has been filed, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present misc. petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
27-Vivek/Shahenshah/-
Umeda Ram
Ratni Devi
Mamta
Sugna
Rakesh
State Of Rajasthan
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court