Punja Ram v. Vivek Singh and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the misc. petition after stating that the parties had compromised the matter outside the court. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Petitioner withdrew the misc. petition after stating that the parties had compromised the matter outside the court. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 170/2012
Punja Ram Patel S/o Khema Patel, by caste Patel, Resident of 6, Shakti Bhawan near Mali Colony, Jhada-Amla, Tekri, Udaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Shah For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Bhati, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
20/10/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have compromised the matter outside the Court and, therefore, he does not want to press this petition.
In view of the compromise entered into between the parties, the present misc. petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
C-1-/Vivek/Shahenshah/-
Punja Ram Patel
Vivek Singh
The State of Rajasthan
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court