Allowed

Tofiq Ahmed S/O Kabir Ahmed v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Aug 2021CRLMB/7921/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in a cattle-related case. The petitioner was released on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions regarding interrogation and non-interference with witnesses without expressing an opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner released on personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each with conditions regarding interrogation and travel.

Tofiq Ahmed S/O Kabir Ahmed Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7921/2021

¶3

Tofiq Ahmed S/o Kabir Ahmed, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Vill. Khushpuri Tehsil Nageena Dist. Nuh Mewat Haryana

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.K. Dixit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Atul Sharma, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

Order

05/08/2021

Defects are waived.

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.125/2021 registered at Police Station Nagar, District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Sections 5 and 6/8 of R.B.A Act.

¶14

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has been made an accused on account of Power of Attorney Holder of the vehicle. Co-accused Kasam who transported bovine animal, was enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this court u/s 439 Cr.P.C. Nothing is to be recovered from the petitioner. So, the petitioner be enlarged on bail.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-7921/2021]

¶19

the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶20

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Nagar, District Bharatpur in FIR No.125/2021 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Tofiq Ahmed S/o Kabir Ahmed , he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶21

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶22

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶23

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶24

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶25

Brijesh 97.

Tofiq Ahmed S/O Kabir Ahmed v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tofiq Ahmed S/O Kabir Ahmed v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamal S/O Hazari Vs State of Rajasthan

Ayub S/O Noormohammad Vs State of Rajasthan

Devilal Roj Son of Shri Chiganlal Roj Vs State of Rajasthan

Niraj Nigotiya Son of Shri Brajbhan Vs State of Rajasthan

Santosh Son of Sumer Singh Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Jagdish Prasad Yadav S/O Shri Ghasiram Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan