High Court dismissed anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. by two petitioners charged with murder and other offences. The Court held that the gravity of the allegations made the petitioners unfit for bail.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4445/2021
Niraj Nigotiya Son Of Shri Brajbhan, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Khedali Gurjar P.s - Sadar Hindon Presently Residing At 56, Jabdamba Colony, Agra Road, Paldi Meena, Jaipur - 302031 (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4855/2021
Santosh Son Of Sumer Singh Gurjar, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Jagdishpura, Police Station Balghat, Tehasil Todabheem, District Karoli (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P., Jaipur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Mr. M. M. Ranjan, Sr. Adv. on behalf of Mr. Rajat Ranjan with Mr. J. K. Moolchandani For Respondent(s) : Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP. Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order
05/08/2021
(2 of 3)
[CRLMB-4445/2021]
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-4445/2021]
story in their statements under Section 161 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the complainant also submitted that Narpat Singh in his statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. clearly stated that Neeraj Nagotiya and his friends had deliberately hit to the deceased Neetu Gurjar when she was going with her brother on motor-cycle. So, looking to the gravity of the offence, anticipatory bail application be dismissed.
Seema/23-24
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present anticipatory bail application is a fit case for enlargement considering the gravity of the charges.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ganpat Lal Vs. State of RajasthanReferred¶22
Ganpat Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan; Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.3988/2017
Shobha Ram Vs. State of U.P.Referred¶22
Shobha Ram Vs. State of U.P.; Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No.9784/1991
Yunis and Anr. Vs. State of U.P.Referred¶22
Yunis and Anr. Vs. State of U.P.; Criminal Miscellaneous 1st Bail Application No.4937/1998
Raghbir Singh @ Lucky and Anr. Vs. State of PunjabReferred¶22
Raghbir Singh @ Lucky and Anr. Vs. State of Punjab; Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.25848/2020
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Niraj Nigotiya
Santosh Son Of Sumer Singh Gurjar
State Of Rajasthan
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
