Allowed

Ayub S/O Noormohammad v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Aug 2021CRLMB/6525/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'le Mr. Justice Narendra Singh Dhaddha allowed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. regarding offences under the R.B.A. Act, releasing the petitioner on personal bond with two sureties upon meeting specified conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner to be released on personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each subject to conditions.

Ayub S/O Noormohammad Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6525/2021

¶3

Ayub S/o Noormohammad, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Gram Alghani Police Thana Sikri District Bharatpur

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar, Adv. through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S. Ola, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶10

Order

¶11

04/08/2021

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.78/2021 registered at Police Station Sikri, District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Sections 5 & 8 of R. B. A. Act.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been wrongly implicated in this case. Similarly situated co-accused Rafiq has been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench. Case of the petitioner is similar to that of co-accused. Nothing is to be recovered from the petitioner and no custodial interrogation is required of the petitioner.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-6525/2021]

¶18

case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶19

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Sikri, District Bharatpur in FIR No.78/2021 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Ayub S/o Noormohammad , he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶20

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶21

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶22

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶23

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶24

Gourav/34

Ayub S/O Noormohammad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ayub S/O Noormohammad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju S/O Praveen Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil S/O Ramswaroop Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramrai S/O Bhauri Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamal S/O Hazari Vs State of Rajasthan

Devilal Roj Son of Shri Chiganlal Roj Vs State of Rajasthan

Pankaj Kumar Gautam S/O Kshetrapal Gautam Vs State of Rajasthan