Allowed

Pankaj Kumar Gautam S/O Kshetrapal Gautam v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Aug 2021CRLMB/7621/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for alleged offences under the R.B.A. Act, directing police to release the petitioner on bail with a personal bond and two sureties upon arrest.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner directed to furnish personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each.

Pankaj Kumar Gautam S/O Kshetrapal Gautam Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7621/2021

¶3

Pankaj Kumar Gautam S/o Kshetrapal Gautam, Aged About 32 Years, R/o House No. 27, Saraswati Bihar Balajipuram Aurangabad Khadar, Police Station Highway Mathura, District Mathura (Uttar Pradesh).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Navankur Dubey, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S. Ola, PP

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶9

Order

¶10

04/08/2021

¶11

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.164/2021 registered at Police Station Nagar, District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Sections 5, 6/8 of R.B.A. Act.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Bovine Animal transported by Teekam Singh and Shahrukh Khan. They were enlarged on bail by the coordinate bench of this court under Section 439 Cr.P.C. Nothing is to be recovered from the petitioner.

¶13

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶14

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-7621/2021]

¶17

case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶18

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Nagar, District Bharatpur in F.I.R. No. 164/2021 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Pankaj Kumar Gautam S/o Kshetrapal

¶19

Gautam , he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶20

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶21

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶22

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶23

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶24

Jatin /36

Pankaj Kumar Gautam S/O Kshetrapal Gautam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj Kumar Gautam S/O Kshetrapal Gautam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju S/O Praveen Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil S/O Ramswaroop Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramrai S/O Bhauri Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamal S/O Hazari Vs State of Rajasthan

Ayub S/O Noormohammad Vs State of Rajasthan

Devilal Roj Son of Shri Chiganlal Roj Vs State of Rajasthan