This order addresses an anticipatory bail application where the learned counsel for the petitioners did not press the application on behalf of all petitioners, as regular bail had already been granted by the trial court.
The bail application is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7498/2021
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Arpit Samaria |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Gourav Singh,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
11/11/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the present case chargesheet has already been filed and petitioners
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-7498/2021]
have been granted regular bail by the learned trial Court, hence, he does not want to press the present bail application on behalf of all the petitioners.
Accordingly, the bail application preferred on behalf of all petitioners filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J 160-AnilKC/-
Vijay Singh S/o Pratap Singyh
Pratap Singh S/o Late Devi Singh
Kalpana Kanwar D/o Pratap Singh
Kailashi Kanwar W/o Pratap Singh
Jayshree D/o Pratap Singh
Rekha D/o Pratap Singh
Sudes B. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
