Parwati v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The single-judge bench of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners in a Section 306 IPC case, noting that the dispute appears settled between parties, subject to furnishing a personal bond and sureties.
What did the court decide?
Allowance of anticipatory bail application directing release on personal bond of Rs.50,000/ - with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each subject to conditions of interrogation, non-interference, and no dep
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 745/2021
- Parwati W/o S. Mangtu Ram, Aged About 40 Years, Ward No. 3, Suratgarh, District Sri Ganganagar.
- Sushila W/o Rajendra Kumar, Aged About 36 Years, Ward No. 3, Suratgarh, District Sri Ganganagar.
----Petitioners
Versus
State, Through P.P
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Gill For Respondent(s) : Mr. Farzand Ali, AAG-cum-GA Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP Mr. Pankaj Gupta for complainant
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Judgment / Order
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to petitioners apprehending arrest in connection with FIR No.302/2020 for offence under Section 306 IPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Parwati W/o S. Mangtu Ram
- petitioner
Sushila W/o Rajendra Kumar
- respondent
State, Through P.P.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/745/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court