Petitioner filed anticipatory bail application for alleged misappropriation of crude oil causing disappearance. Despite claimed compromise, no documentary proof was placed on record during adjournments.
Anticipatory bail application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6485/2021
Rahul Makkad S/o Jeevan Das, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Nai Abadi, Hanumangarh Town, Tehsil And Dist. Hanumangarh.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Jeetender Singh Khichi |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. B.R. Bishnoi,AGC |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
27/10/2021
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the case diary.
The petitioner has filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC in connection with FIR No.70/2021 registered at Police Station Sadar, Sri Ganganagar for offence under Sections 420, 406 & 120-B IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is that he misappropriated huge quantity of crude oil 12,000 litre, sold the same and disappeared. During the course of arguments of present bail application, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that a compromise has been arrived at. This Court vide order dated 29.09.2021 permitted the petitioner to verify the compromise said to have been arrived at between the parties.
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-6485/2021]
No such compromise has been placed on record, despite taking adjournment many a time, looking to the nature of the offence and considering the fact that in large amount of crude oil has been seized, on the spot, this Court does not find the present case fit for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
The bail application is dismissed.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
176-Anshul/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail granted under Section 438 CrPC given the allegations of misappropriation and spite of the alleged compromise.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rahul Makkad
State Of Rajasthan
Sudesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
