Dismissed
Madan Singh v. State
Rajasthan HCCRLMB/10717/2021
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The bail application was dismissed because the petitioner's counsel did not press the application. As no substantive issue was adjudicated, there is no precedent value.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
¶2
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10717/2021
¶3
Madan Singh S/o Sh. Unkar, Aged About 32 Years, Dhabla, P.s. Narayangarh, Dist. Mandsoor.
¶4
----Petitioner
¶5
Versus
¶6
State, Through Pp
¶7
----Respondent
¶8
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. VijayKumar Gaur |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. B.R. Bishnoi,AGC |
¶9
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
¶10
Order
¶11
27/10/2021
¶12
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this criminal misc. bail application.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Madan Singh
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Sudes Bansal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/10717/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court