Allowed

Narendra Kumar S/O Shiv Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Aug 2021CRLMB/2978/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The petitioner, involved in kidnapping and abduction charges with a married prosecutrix, was granted bail subject to furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, adhering to standard conditions regarding interrogation and foreign travel.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner to furnish personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Narendra Kumar S/O Shiv Ram Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2978/2021

¶3

Narendra Kumar S/o Shiv Ram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Hingwa Wala Mohalla, Nichaia Meena Patti, Sikrai, District Dausa.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Sharma, Adv. through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶9

Order

¶10

06/08/2021

¶11

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.17/2021 registered at Police Station Sikandra, District Dausa for the offence(s) under Sections 363 and 366 IPC.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation as per direction of this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner and prosecutrix are major and they have solemnized the marriage. Marriage Certificate is annexed as Annexure No.4 with the petition. Nothing is to be recovered from the petitioner.

¶13

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶14

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-2978/2021]

¶17

case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶18

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Sikandra, District Dausa in FIR No.17/2021 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Narendra Kumar S/o Shiv Ram , he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶19

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶20

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶21

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶22

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶23

Gourav/32

Narendra Kumar S/O Shiv Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narendra Kumar S/O Shiv Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niraj Nigotiya Son of Shri Brajbhan Vs State of Rajasthan

Santosh Son of Sumer Singh Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Jagdish Prasad Yadav S/O Shri Ghasiram Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahfooj Khan S/O Late Shri Ajijurrahman Vs State of Rajasthan

Dashrath Sahu S/O Ramdev Sahu Vs State of Rajasthan

Gajendra Singh Late Shri Dan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan