Allowed

Naresh Kumar S/O Shri Dharampal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Dec 2021CRLMB/18267/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court allowed the petitioner's plea for bail, noting his long custody and the likely delay in trial conclusion, though expressly without expressing an opinion on the merits of the allegations.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail in connection with the FIR in matters mentioned, subject to personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.

Naresh Kumar S/O Shri Dharampal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 18267/2021

¶3

Naresh Kumar S/o Shri Dharampal, R/o Ghandawa P.S. Surajgarh Dist. Jhunjhunu Raj. At Present In Sub Jail Chirawa Jhunjhunu

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nav Ratan Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yashwant Kankhedia, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶10

Order

¶11

07/12/2021

¶12

This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

Brief facts of the case are that an FIR No.0301/2021 was registered at P.S. Pilani, District Jhunjhunu for the offences mentioned therein against the accused petitioner. During the course of investigation, the accused petitioner was arrested. Thereafter, he moved the bail application before the trial court, which vide impugned order dismissed the same. Hence, this bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner.

¶14

Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case as he has nothing to do with the alleged incident. Counsel further submits that the accused petitioner is behind bars since long. Charge-sheet has already been filed. Conclusion of the trial may

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-18267/2021]

¶17

likely to take time. Hence the accused petitioner be released on bail.

¶18

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for accused petitioner, note of the allegations levelled against the petitioner as also looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Therefore, this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner Naresh Kumar S/o Shri Dharampal shall be released on bail in connection with afore-mentioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶22

Ritu/6

Naresh Kumar S/O Shri Dharampal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naresh Kumar S/O Shri Dharampal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishnu S/O Nehanulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Murli S/O Babulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Wahid Hussain @ Daud S/O Abdul Hussain @ Lalu Chaha Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajbahadur @ Botu Son of Sh. Om Prakash Vs State of Rajasthan

Najil Qureshi Son of Anwar Qureshi Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh S/O Ramjeevan Vs State of Rajasthan