Allowed

Murli S/O Babulal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Dec 2021CRLMB/18004/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court directed the release of the petitioner who had already filed a bail application before the trial court and was confined in jail, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Murli S/O Babulal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 18004/2021

¶3

Murli S/o Babulal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Bikapura Mahadevwali Thana Sadar Tonk And District Tonk (Raj.). (At Present Accused Confined In Jail Tonk)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Meena, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶10

Order

¶11

06/12/2021

¶12

This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

Brief facts of the case are that an FIR No.179/2021 was registered at P.S. Devli, District Tonk for the offences mentioned therein against the accused petitioner. During the course of investigation, the accused petitioner was arrested. Thereafter, he moved the bail application before the trial court, which vide impugned order dismissed the same. Hence, this bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner.

¶14

Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case as he has nothing to do with the alleged incident. Counsel further submits that charge-sheet has been filed. Counsel further submits that the accused petitioner is behind the bars since long.

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-18004/2021]

¶17

Conclusion of the trial may likely to take time. Hence, the accused petitioner be released on bail.

¶18

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for accused petitioner, note of the allegations levelled against the petitioner as also looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Therefore, this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner Murli S/o Babulal shall be released on bail in connection with aforementioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶22

CHARU/10

Murli S/O Babulal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Murli S/O Babulal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh S/O Chandalal Vs State of Rajasthan

Arjun Goswami @ Ishwarlal Giri S/O Kalulal Giri Vs State of Rajasthan

Rakesh Meena S/O Shri Srinarayan Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishnu S/O Nehanulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Wahid Hussain @ Daud S/O Abdul Hussain @ Lalu Chaha Vs State of Rajasthan

Dhanna Lal S/O Chhitarlal Vs State of Rajasthan