Allowed

Kum Paras v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Dec 2021CRLMB/16455/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16455/2021, the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur granted bail to the petitioner accused of cheating and criminal conspiracy, directing his release on personal bond subject to sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail in a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000 each.

Kum Paras Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16455/2021

¶3

Kum Paras D/o Sh. Babu Lal, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Hapu Ki Dhani, Bhalani, Bagora Police Station, Dist. Jalore. (Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	B RayBishnoi	----Respondent
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Javed Gauri,PP

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL

¶9

Order

¶10

08/12/2021

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

¶12

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.331/2021 of Police Station Kudi Bhagtasni, District Jodhpur East for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420 & 120-B IPC and under Section 3/6 of Rajasthan Examination Act, 1992. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the first bail application was dismissed vide order dated 08.11.2021 in view of fact that the investigation is pending. Thereafter, the investigation is completed and charge-sheet has been filed on 23.11.2021. Counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the offences alleged against the petitioner are triable by magistrate and the petitioner is in judicial custody since the date of his arrest,

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-16455/2021]

¶16

the conclusion of investigation/trial may take its own time. Therefore, he prays to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶17

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶18

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, looking to the fact that the offences alleged against the petitioner are triable by magistrate and the charge-sheet has been filed, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶19

Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Kum Paras D/o Sh. Babu Lal shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.331/2021 of Police Station Kudi Bhagtasni, District. Jodhpur East provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶20

(SUDESH BANSAL),J

¶21

179-Anshul/-

Kum Paras v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kum Paras v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Malkeet Kaur Vs State Bank of India

Assitant Commercial Tax Department, Circle-B, Bikaner Vs M/S Varsha Ritu

Manisha Sehgal Vs Lokesh Kumar Maggo

Husna Vs Abdul Shakoor

Shyamsundar Vs Satyanarayan

Suman Kanar Vs Kashi Ram