Allowed

Mukesh Kumar S/O Sitaram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC21 Oct 2021CRLMB/16005/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge order allowed two bail applications filed for offences under Sections 332 and 353 IPC. The court, without expressing an opinion on merits, granted bail via personal bond with two sureties to each petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed on a personal bond in Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each to the satisfaction of the trial Judge.

Mukesh Kumar S/O Sitaram Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16005/2021

¶3

Mukesh Kumar S/o Sitaram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Raipura Ps Manpur Dist. Dausa At Present In Sub Jail Bandikui

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

Connected With

¶9

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16006/2021 Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri Rampratap, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Jahangiriya Ps Sikandara Dist. Dausa At Present Accused Confined In Dist. Jail Dausa

¶10

State Of Rajasthan,	----Petitioner Versus Through Pp ----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Umesh Vyas, Mr. Vishwanath Karan Rathore
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Chandragupt Chopra,PP.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶12

Order

¶13

21/10/2021

¶14

The present bail applications have been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.398/2021 Registered at Police Station Sikandra, District Dausa for the offence(s) under Sections 332, 353 of IPC.

¶15

Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been wrongly implicated in this case. Both the petitioners are behind the bars since 20.09.2021 and 22.09.2021. Offence

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-16005/2021]

¶18

against the petitioners is triable by Magistrate. Conclusion of trial may take long time.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications.

¶20

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioners and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners Mukesh Kumar S/o Sitaram and Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri Rampratap

¶22

shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

A copy of this order be placed in connected file.

¶24

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶25

Seema/83-84

Mukesh Kumar S/O Sitaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Kumar S/O Sitaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sugan Songara W/O Shri Navratna Songara Vs State of Rajasthan

Navratan Songara S/O Shri Krishn Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Nadim S/O Gulfam Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohd. Islam S/O Mohd. Sadik Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramjeet Meena S/O Hansraj Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Manoj S/O Late Surajkaran Jat Vs the State of Rajasthan