Allowed

Nadim S/O Gulfam v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Oct 2021CRLMB/11378/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. regarding murder charges, the High Court deemed it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/ with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/ each.

Nadim S/O Gulfam Vs State of Rajasthan — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11378/2021

¶3

Nadim S/o Gulfam, Aged About 20 Years, Residence House No. 957 Macchi Market, Imam Chowk Ghatgate Police Station Ramganj Currently Residing House No. B- 225, Nagtalai Kalli Ka Bhatta Police Station Galta Gate Jaipur

¶4

Aarif S/o Gulfam, Aged About 20 Years, Residence House No. 957 Macchi Market, Imam Chowk Ghatgate Police Station Ramganj Currently Residing House No. B-225, Nagtalai Kalli Ka Bhatta Police Station Galta Gate Jaipur

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohd. Umar Farooq For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶11

Order

¶12

20/10/2021

¶13

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.180/2021 registered at Police Station Galta Gate Jaipur City (North) for the offence(s) under Sections 302 and 34 IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been wrongly implicated in this case. They are behind the bars since 8.6.2021. Charge sheet has been filed against the petitioners. Nothing is recovered from the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that Naeem had

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-11378/2021]

¶17

inflicted injury by knife to the deceased. Conclusion of trial may take long time. Hence, the petitioners be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioners and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners (1) Nadim S/o Gulfam and (2) Aarif S/o Gulfam shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶20

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶21

Brijesh 41.

Nadim S/O Gulfam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nadim S/O Gulfam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Vs State

Ram Karan Vs State

Rakesh Vs State

Sugan Songara W/O Shri Navratna Songara Vs State of Rajasthan

Navratan Songara S/O Shri Krishn Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishnu S/O Late Shri Mangaturam Vs State of Rajasthan