The High Court bench dismissed a bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail. The court refused to enlarge the petitioner due to the gravity of the offences involved.
The petition for anticipatory bail is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12891/2021
Kundan Singh S/o Shri Ramswaroop, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Barnanwadi PS Jurhara Dist. Bharatpur Raj.
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
.. i-,~ 1- t - !t 7 2 - ----Respondent
3 I.?& jW*.,i B-7g 3 # 5 +
&-. y- &A- -- - -=A rd &$7
.rs 3. .* " 8 eYT
be
For Petitioner(s)=--7 ' : Mr. Anil Kumar Upmqn ,
; .m?'
For Respondent(s) U : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mahla c 8 PP,
ppzYw Mr. Manish Gupta C.
F2 Y
a, 0 I< .>* yr4 ' &s=,
7
26/11/2021
filed under Section 438 The present bail a Cr.P.C. in connection wi 2020 registered at Police Station Jurhara, Distri r the offence(s) under 307 IPC and Section Sections 147, 148, 3/25(6) of Arms Act. Learned counsel fo mits that petitioner has -biPp-7.4Sb %\ --J1"= been wrongly implicate~~C\h~~~ cas,g4Nqo$~ing is to be recovered from the petitioner. Sor the petitioner be enlarged on anticipatory bail.
Learned public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and submitted that petitioner had run Jeep over the deceased Asharfi and Asharfi was died. SO, looking
anticipatory bail application be
to the gravity of offence, dismissed.
I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the complainant and learned Public Prosecutor. So, looking to the gravity of offence, I do not consider it a fit case to enlarge the
petitioner on anticipatory bail.
A. -,,* k;,! +I' .t--fl.; -r -- f--%
Hence, anticip,ato& ball applct~~tlom stahds dismissed. t* q k- ".-c J,W l. :I CS) I* l.r {7ev 4; y7.$' ! \ - &=-> '.- P 2% TctL3' (NARENDRA SINGFIDADDHA),J \ ,,- -4 -$ '3 Brijesh 85~;' 4: ..;Y 3 $
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in the pending criminal case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kundan Singh
State Of Rajasthan
Narendra Singh Daddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
