Allowed

Pappulal S/O Surajmal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC25 Nov 2021CRLMB/13621/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On an application for bail filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. regarding offences under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC, the High Court deemed it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail without expressing an opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each to the satisfaction of the trial judge.

Pappulal S/O Surajmal Vs State of Rajasthan — Domestic Violence | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13621/2021

¶3

Pappulal S/o Surajmal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Dhani Sisuri Nalvali Tan Kariri Ps Amarsar Dist. Jaipur Raj. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, Adv. & Mr. Anirudh Tyagi, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP Mr. Indrapal Jakhar, Adv.

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶9

Order

¶10

25/11/2021

¶11

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 75/2021 Registered at Police Station Amarsar, Jaipur Rural for the offence(s) under Sections 498-A & 306 IPC.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been wrongly implicated in this case. He is behind the bars since 30.06.2021. Charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the deceased had committed suicide on 21.04.2021. FIR was lodged on 25.04.2021 after inordinate delay of 4 days. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that sister of the

¶13

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-13621/2021]

¶14

deceased Anita Devi had not uttered a single word about cruelty/dowry. Conclusion of trial may take long time.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application. 4. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶16

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Pappulal S/o Surajmal shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶17

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶18

Gourav/12

Pappulal S/O Surajmal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pappulal S/O Surajmal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Om Prakash Vishnoi S/O Ladu Ram Vishnoi Vs State of Rajasthan

Shailendra Sharma S/O Shri Girraj Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Khan Singh S/O Shri Latoor Singh Rajpoot Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahendra Singh S/O Patram Vs State of Rajasthan

Neelesh Kumar S/O Sh. M.R. Nimesh Vs State of Rajasthan

Kapil S/O Satyaveer Vs State of Rajasthan