Allowed

Arjun S/O Bhagwansingh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC11 Nov 2021CRLMB/12713/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed bail to the accused under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a trial for offences under IPC 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act, considering the length of trial and lack of prosecutrix support, subject to furnishing bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail subject to furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the trial Judge.

Arjun S/O Bhagwansingh Vs State of Rajasthan — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12713/2021

¶3

Arjun S/o Bhagwansingh, R/o Lodhapada, Goverdhan Gate, Deeg, Police Station Deeg District Bharatpur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Sewar District Bharatpur)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶10

Order

¶11

11/11/2021

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.545/2020 Registered at Police Station Deeg, District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He is behind the bars since 10.09.2020. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that during trial, prosecutrix had not supported the story of prosecution and conclusion of trial may take long time.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the

¶16

petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-12713/2021]

¶19

case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Arjun S/o Bhagwansingh shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶22

Jatin /19

Arjun S/O Bhagwansingh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arjun S/O Bhagwansingh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dauji S/O Baljeet Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Vikram @ Galla S/O Umrav Vs the State of Rajasthan

Rohit Verma S/O Shri Basant Verma Vs State of Rajasthan

Vinita @ Puja D/O Shri Mohanlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sajid Khan Son of Shri Gurmalli Mev Vs State of Rajasthan

Rakesh Kumar Son of Heera Lal Vs State of Rajasthan