Allowed

Vishnu S/O Late Shri Mangaturam v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Oct 2021CRLMB/10198/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the bail application filed by Vishnu under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.160/2021 registered for offences under Sections 363 and 366-A of IPC. The court heard arguments regarding false implication and released the petitioner on bail with a personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing a personal bond in sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Vishnu S/O Late Shri Mangaturam Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10198/2021

¶3

Vishnu S/o Late Shri Mangaturam, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Hasanpur, Police Station Laxmangarh Distt. Alwar (Raj.) (Accused Petitioner Confined In Dist. Jail Alwar)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Chand Thakuriya, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶9

Order

¶10

20/10/2021

¶11

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.160/2021 Registered at Police Station Nogaon, District Alwar (Rajasthan) for the offence(s) under Sections 363 and 366-A of IPC.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He is behind the bars since 13.05.2021. Charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that prosecutrix in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. clearly stated that she had gone with the petitioner with her own will and the petitioner had not committed any wrong with her. Conclusion of trial may take long time.

¶13

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-10198/2021]

¶16

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶17

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Vishnu S/o Late Shri Mangaturam shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶18

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶19

Jatin /35

Vishnu S/O Late Shri Mangaturam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishnu S/O Late Shri Mangaturam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Vs State

Ram Karan Vs State

Rakesh Vs State

Sugan Songara W/O Shri Navratna Songara Vs State of Rajasthan

Navratan Songara S/O Shri Krishn Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Nadim S/O Gulfam Vs State of Rajasthan