Allowed

Muveen S/O Ayub v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Aug 2021CRLMB/11008/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court allowed anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. regarding offences under Sections 323, 341, 326 and 34 IPC. Bail granted as parties reached a compromise despite Public Prosecutor's opposition. Petitioners to furnish bond and sureties and comply with specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; petitioners to be released on bail upon furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, complying with conditions regarding interrogation, wit

Muveen S/O Ayub Vs State of Rajasthan — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11008/2021

¶3

Muveen S/o Ayub, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Gram Kakarala, Police Thana Sikri District Bharatpur.

¶4

Ajrudden S/o Rujdar, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Gram Kakarala, Police Thana Sikri District Bharatpur.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P P

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S. Ola, PP Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar, Adv.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶11

Order

¶12

10/08/2021

¶13

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.160/2021 registered at Police Station Sikri, District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Sections 323, 341, 326 and 34 IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a compromise has been arrived between the parties.

¶15

Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute this

¶16

fact of compromise between the parties.

¶17

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶18

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioners and also the fact that parties have entered into compromise and without expressing any opinion on the merits of

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[CRLMB-11008/2021]

¶21

the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶22

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The SHO/IO/Arresting Authority, Police Station Sikri, District Bharatpur in FIR No.160/2021 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners- Muveen S/o Ayub and Ajrudden S/o Rujdar they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of

¶23

Rs.25,000/- each to his satisfaction on the following conditions :- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶24

(ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶25

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶26

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶27

Jatin /61

Muveen S/O Ayub v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muveen S/O Ayub v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahfooj Khan S/O Late Shri Ajijurrahman Vs State of Rajasthan

Narendra Kumar S/O Shiv Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Dashrath Sahu S/O Ramdev Sahu Vs State of Rajasthan

Bheru S/O Kanna Vs State of Rajasthan

Ikram S/O Kale Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Saddiq S/O Samsu Vs the State of Rajasthan