Allowed

Jasodabai W/O Ramchandra @ Chandralal v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC27 Jul 2021CRLMB/10552/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court bench allowed an anticipatory bail application for two female petitioners who were victims in an injuries case, releasing them on bail bonded before expressing hard opinions on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on anticipatory bail by executing a joint bond of Rs 25,000 and Rs 50,000 to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer.

Jasodabai W/O Ramchandra @ Chandralal Vs the State of… — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR WASTHAN

¶2

BENCH AT 3AIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10552/2021

¶4

1. Jasodabai W/o Rarnchandra @ Chandralal, Aged About 50 Yean, R/o Bagariyon Ka Kheda Police Station Bhawanimandi, Dist. Jhalawar (Raj).

¶5

Kankubai W/o Prakash, Aged About 30 Years, R/o
Bagariyon Ka Kheda Police Station Bhawanimandi Dist.
Jhalawar (Raj.).
.-a% N HBP* ----Petitioners
Versus
G%~~~ - --""Q 0
The State qbsthan, Through Pp "02
V ,"
v2 ---%$!pendent
& t 63%
'F#
For Petitioner(s) : MrMSh
For Respond
HON'BLE MR. JIII AR SONGARA
der Section 438 Cr.P.C.
A+
This bail application&
red at Police Station
in connection with FII
d
s under sections 147,
Bhawani Mandi, Dist 31
-
Learned COG ~~~j'$l~e~~ifners submits that the
petitioners are ladies and have minor children. Petitioners have
no criminal antecedents. Hence, the bail application of the
petitioners may kindly be granted.

¶6

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶7

Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the fact that according to

¶8

the injun/ repo* Of injured Ramchandra, Sultan, Seetaram and Soram ~ait all injuries are simple in nature, caused by blunt weapon and therefore looking to the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail.

¶9

Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is allowed and it is order ase. '1 of a-r of the petitioners * amchandra and Kankuba ~v6akash, in 21 registered at Police Station Bhawa ~Pandi, Dist v' (4 -, " , G&3< the investigation officer, they shall be released'on bail

¶10

provided each of them al bond in the sum of sum of Rs 25,000/Rs.50,000/- togethe each to the satisfa 0 on the following

¶11

conditions:

¶12

ake themselves as and when

¶13

ia without

¶14

per with the evidence in the case. or threaten or

¶15

(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J

¶16

CHHAYA AWASTHI /11

Jasodabai W/O Ramchandra @ Chandralal v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jasodabai W/O Ramchandra @ Chandralal v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashu Son of Shri Devkinadan Vs State of Rajasthan

Mubin S/O Shri Moliya Vs State of Rajasthan

Nihala Ram S/O Late Sh. Mukandaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Hanuman Gurjar S/O Shri Moolchand Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra Kumar Meena S/O Shri Ram Kishor Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Deviram S/O Ramcharan Vs State of Rajasthan