The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed a bail application filed by Dinesh Kumar because the petitioner did not wish to press the application at that stage, granting liberty to revive it later after recording the Investigating Officer's statement.
Liberty to revive the bail application after recording the Investigation Officer's statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 10003/2021
Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh Chandra S/o Sh. Basantilal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o.Village Rabadiya, P.s. Jiran, Dist. Nimuch (Raj.).
(Presently Lodged In Sub Jail, Aburoad, Dist. Sirohi).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Bharat Singh Rathore |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. S.K. Bhati,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
15/11/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present bail application at this stage, however, seeks liberty to revive the bail application after recording the statement of Investigating Officer.
Accordingly, the present bail application is dismissed as not pressed at this stage with liberty, as prayed for.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
129-SanjayS/-
Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh Chandra
State Of Rajasthan
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
