The applicant sought reduction of bank guarantee in a corruption case. The court dismissed the primary application as not pressed but reduced the guarantee amount due to financial crisis.
Bank guarantee reduced from Rs. 3,00,000 to Rs. 2,00,000.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Appli No. 67/2021
IN
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.843/2020
Mahipal S/o Shri Hudmanaram, Aged About 38 Years, Dundo Ki Dhani, Bheemsagar, Osian, Dist. Jodhpur, Power Of Attorney Holder Veera Ram S/o Hukma Ram, By Caste Chaudhary, R/o Gomoniyo Ki Dhani, Hudasar, District Barmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumer Singh Sen For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
24/02/2021
In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.
Counsel for the petitioner does not press the application at this stage but only seeks reduction of bank guarantee.
Looking into Covid times and extreme financial crisis, the application is dismissed as not pressed while substituting the bank guarantee of Rs.3,00,000/- with bank guarantee of Rs.2,00,000/-. Rest of the order dated 05.02.2021 shall remain as it is.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
201-Sanjay/-
Mahipal S/o Shri Hudmanaram
State Of Rajasthan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
