The High Court recalled an order dated 15.05.2019, alleging that it was passed due to a communication gap as the petitioner was present but the court proceeded due to the advocate.
Order dated 15.05.2019 recalled; writ petition dismissed with liberty to approach Debt Recovery Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 2)
[WRW-134/2019]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 134/2019
Shanti Devi W/o Shri Shankar Lal, Aged About 42 Years, By Caste Jat, Resident Of House No. 69 In Front Of Mahila Iti, Patel Nagar, Bikaner.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhijeet Beniwal present in person For Respondent(s) : Mr. AkshayTiwari
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
04/09/2020
(2 of 2)
[WRW-134/2019]
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
31-Sudheer/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to recall an order passed in the absence of the petitioner due to a communication gap.
Whether the petitioner has a right to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal instead of the court.
Shanti Devi
Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank
Dr. Pushendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
