The High Court allowed a misc. application seeking withdrawal of an appeal during the COVID-19 pandemic. Consequently, the appealed appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Application for withdrawal of appeal allowed. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 5091/2011
I.c.i.c.i.lombard G.i.c.ltd.
----Appellant
Versus
Nava Ram And Ors.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vinay Kothari
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
04/09/2020
In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, lawyers have been advised to refrain from coming to the Courts.
The present misc. application No.01/20 has been moved seeking withdrawal of the appeal.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed.
Since the aforesaid application is allowed, therefore, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. All the pending applications also stand dismissed.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
345-Zeeshan/-
I C I C I Lombard G I C Ltd.
Nava Ram And Ors.
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
