Disposed

Madhu Samaria v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Sept 2020CW/8963/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the High Court disposed of a file regarding the petitioner's request for a transfer to her husband's posting. The court directed the respondents to sympathetically consider her representation based on the State policy of posting spouses together.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to sympathetically consider the petitioner's representation for transfer based on State policy within six weeks upon receipt of fresh representation.

Madhu Samaria Vs State of Rajasthan — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8963/2020

¶3

Madhu Samaria W/o Durgesh Kumar Chaula, Aged About 41 Years, Vivekanand Nagar, Sector-4, Rastrogi Dharamshala Ke Pas, Jaipur Road, Alwar (Rajasthan).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary Secondary Education Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan Jaipur (Rajasthan)

¶7

Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner (Rajasthan)

¶8

District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Dholpur, District Dholpur (Rajasthan)

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hira Lal Gothwal For Respondent(s) :

¶11

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶12

Order

¶13

10/09/2020

¶14

In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matter in Court.

¶15

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents to post the petitioner to place where her husband, who is in Government service is posted.

¶16

Various submissions have been made in the writ petition including submission that it is the policy of the State Government to post the husband and wife at the same station and at the place where the petitioner seeks transfer, there are vacant positions.

¶17

In view of the submissions, which have been made in the petition and the fact that the petitioner’s representation is already

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CW-8963/2020]

¶20

pending with the respondents, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to sympathetically consider the representation made by the petitioner based on the policy of the State Government.

¶21

The petitioner would be free to file a fresh representation along with the copy of the present writ petition. If such a fresh representation is made, the same may be considered by the respondents objectively and decide the same by a speaking order within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of this order along with writ petition / representation is placed before the respondents.

¶22

The stay application also stands disposed of.

¶23

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

¶24

205-Sudheer/-

Madhu Samaria v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhu Samaria v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murareelal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Pratap Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Pyare Lal Vs Meera Devi

Sumitra Vs State of Rajasthan

Kavita Choudhary Vs the State of Rajasthan

Mahendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan