The petitioner challenged the deletion of provisions relating to age extension under Rule 9. The court found the petitioner's claim did not survive as the relevant provisions had been deleted and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1)
[CW-449/2020]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 449/2020
Pratap Singh S/o Shri Keshar Singh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Peli Bhagal, Maroowas, District Udaipur (Raj) Presently R/o Shisha Bahawan Circle, Shivam Apartment, Udaipur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
For Petitioner(s) : Mahaveer Bishnoi
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
09/09/2020
has been deleted as per reply filed by the respondents.
of the petitioner for granting extension of age does not survive.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
239-Sanjay/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking extension of service age against deletion of relevant provisions can be entertained.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pratap Singh
State Of Rajasthan
The Divisional Commander, Home Guards Training Center, Udaipur
The Commandant, Home Guards Training Center, Udaipur
Dr. Justice Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
