Disposed

Mahendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Sept 2020CW/8954/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order, treated as a one-line disposal, directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation regarding his posting grievance. The respondents were asked to decide such representation within four weeks. The writ petition and stay petition were disposed of accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file fresh representation; respondents to decide within four weeks. Writ and stay petitions disposed.

Mahendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8954/2020

¶3

Mahendra Singh S/o Shri Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Chandawal, Tehsil Sojat, District Pali.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶7

The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner.

¶8

The District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Pali.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sushil Solanki

¶11

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶12

Order

¶13

10/09/2020

¶14

In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

¶15

The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against order passed by the respondents, whereby, the petitioner has been posted at a particular School indicated in the order.

¶16

After the order of posting, the petitioner made representation for being posted at School where the posts were still vacant. However, the respondents did not pass any order on the said representation.

¶17

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh detailed representation and the respondents may be directed to decide the said representation expeditiously.

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CW-8954/2020]

¶20

In view of the submissions made, the petitioner may approach the respondents by way of filing appropriate representation mentioning all the facts and raising his grievances. Upon filing the same, it is expected from the respondents to decide the representation most expeditiously preferably within a period of four weeks from the date the representation is made alongwith copy of this order.

¶21

In case, the petitioner has any grievance qua the disposal of the representation, he would be free to take appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.

¶22

The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. Stay petition

¶23

also stands disposed of.

¶24

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

¶25

311-Zeeshan/-

Mahendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murareelal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Pratap Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Pyare Lal Vs Meera Devi

Madhu Samaria Vs State of Rajasthan

Sumitra Vs State of Rajasthan

Kavita Choudhary Vs the State of Rajasthan