Single judge of the Rajasthan High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC. The petitioner, alleged to have run away from the scene leaving behind a vehicle seized with illicit liquor, was denied bail despite claims of lack of connection with the case.
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9568/2020
Rajendra Singh S/o Baji Singh, R/o Punjabi Mohalla, Kasba Kumher, Police Station Kumher, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Singhal (Through VC) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Order
19/10/2020
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-9568/2020]
(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J
Pooja/61
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for anticipatory bail in connection with offences under the Rajasthan Excise Act.
Whether the petitioner's lack of connection with the vehicle or identification process warrants granting bail.
Whether the allegations of absconding and running away from the spot justify refusal of anticipatory bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajendra Singh
State Of Rajasthan
Manoj Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
