Allowed

Devendra@Sagar S/O Hargovind v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Oct 2020CRLMB/8654/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a criminal miscellaneous bail application filed by two accusedpersons in connection with an FIR causing theft under Section 379 IPC. The court deemed it fit to enlarge them on bail subject to execution of a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Accusedheeralal and Devendra shall be released on bail in FIR No.32/2020 upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.

Devendra@Sagar S/O Hargovind Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6800/2020

¶3

Heeralal S/o Ramdev, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bapu Nagar Colony, 80 Feet Road, Niwai, P.S. Niwai, Dist. Tonk Raj. At Present Confined In Dist. Jail, Sawai Madhopur.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

Connected With

¶9

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8654/2020

¶10

Devendra @ Sagar S/o Hargovind, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Sardar Patel Nagar Colony Niwai P.S. Niwai Dist. Tonk (At Present Confined In Dist. Jail Sawai Madhopur)

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal, through V.C. Mr. Anil Kumar Jain, through V.C. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Meena, PP

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS Order

¶17

01/10/2020

¶18

This Criminal Misc. Bail Application has been brought under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking regular bail in connection with FIR No.32/2020 registered at Police Station Chouth Ka Barwara, District Sawai Madhopur for offences under Section 379 of IPC.

¶19

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners through Jitsi

Meet.

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-6800/2020]

It has been argued on behalf of the petitioners that this is a case of false implication. There is no evidence against them on record. All other criminal cases shown as pending against them have been lodged in the same Police Station in a continuous sequence bearing FIR Nos.28/2020, 29/2020, 30/2020 and 31/2020. Challan has been filed. Completion of trial will take time.

¶24

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶25

On consideration submissions made by both the parties and perusal of material available on record and taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused on bail.

¶26

Therefore, the bail application is allowed. Accusedpetitioners Heeralal S/o Ramdev and Devendra @ Sagar S/o Hargovind , shall be released on bail in FIR No.32/2020 registered at Police Station Chouth Ka Barwara, District Sawai Madhopur for offences, if they are not wanted in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/(Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶27

(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J

¶28

Aks/-2-3

Devendra@Sagar S/O Hargovind v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Devendra@Sagar S/O Hargovind v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhinda@Ram Prasad S/O Jagannath Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramsahay S/O Shri Kanaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Bharat S/O Rajendra Vs State of Rajasthan

Heeralal S/O Ramdev Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramjilal S/O Seetaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Pramod Kumar S/O Motilal Vs State of Rajasthan