Allowed

Pappu@Ajit S/O Lilaram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Sept 2020CRLMB/6987/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single judge allowed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for petitioner No.1 pursuant to a withdrawn bail application filed by petitioner No.2, imposing standard conditions including surrender of security, availability for interrogation, prohibition against tampering with evidence, and restriction on leaving India without court permission.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted to applicant under Section 438 Cr.P.C. with conditions regarding security, sureties, interrogation, and travel restrictions.

Pappu@Ajit S/O Lilaram Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT 3AIPIPR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 698712020

¶3

1. Pappu@ajit S/o Lilaram, R/o Gandhinagar Tehsil And PS Mundawar Distt. Alwar Raj.

¶4

Subesingh S/o Lilaram, R/o Gandhinagar Tehsil And PS Mundawar Distt. Alwar Raj.

¶5

Versus ."

¶6

I-, 2 c"*
State Of ~ajastha.n,-l&o$ogh ~b. 1 * . '. .
'.a ';, - C"z,
For etiti&@r(s) X -; : Mr. Arun Singh Shekha~~a dwr%
. -f
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Charldragupt Chopra, PP.:F%
Mr. Bharat Yadav

¶7

%, - - 2. "*.
:$?., <,Jp-;: ,.% *XdJ7 -& 9,
HON'BLE MR. USTCE .MAREMD,~ ~XNGH DHADDHA
' ,+!' & , b 3 ++/+ LG';
b- i.-t.! I &) . + -..,
"d **I , "+ rb: P " - -.. ,
.I2$.. :~i&<.:; i-..
: .$;c , :d .

¶8

Learned counsel for, the' petitioner No.2, Subesingh r .j 1 <. 5 kd if submits that he wants toMith'draw(kh$'s;bail application with liberty - ;, I,,* . .?$/ +l ,' ") eg ;.,c. . P.L <: L+* **6 8:** , ,+ " _.**3*c3_ %% k to the accused petitio$er+~o.2;tb ~8uiteijder~before - - the' trial Court. _.$!i3_ -* * - - 1; - ' I 1 .. _;I_ **q** C {I$> 5*&$*x< " " , g-%%#: i'lj*. J j- Therefore, this zll;;;p,pl~~$f!gA-~&$f petitioner No.2, is :";, . ".;,7" &r-E;;,-* smissed as withdrawn %,+ with +*%$ liberty . . .. as aforesaid. "" -".' --, (us? a z:, *": q , . L2 .,; % However, the petitioner No.2 may sucrrender before the trial

¶9

Court and-file the bail application.

¶10

It is expected from the trial Court to decide the application

¶11

as filed by the petitioner No.2, as expeditiously as possible.

¶12

The present bail apgiication has been filed under Section 438

¶13

Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.I24/2020 registered at Police Station Mundawar, Alwar for the offence under Sections 143, 323, 341, 452 IPC.

¶14

Perused the material available on record which is mentioned in the application, but without expressing any final opinion on the merit and de-merit of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioner No.1, Pappu @ Ajit.

¶15

Consequently, the application far anticipatory bail of accused-petitioner No. I, Pappu @ Ajit, is ailowed.

¶16

The SHO/IO/Arresting Authority, Police Station Mundawar, ~ ** ?'\ \ Alwar in FIR ~o.l24/2020'-is .& airected kzin -.- the event of arrest of , " ‘.% &, -r -, ",a- Qr XI 1'4. the petitioner,. Nb: I, Pappu@ajit S/o ~ilbra he shall be "... "i: 'k &$f> 4k 3 released &n\bail, provided he furnishes personal 62 of RS.~~:OOO/with two surety of

¶17

g .% . i: '* tisfaction on the following coqiitions :: /; * IPl;* -iC" 'I. . , ff. J,$$ $.;- 7' *; : **,P*_** $4 ; rs ." (i) that the pe'fitin$r rS rL- s,f,5,1aCtbi 'No:.&.Shdl gr . . 8. mabl(e . f %. himself available for interrogation!$by:-/.a. ' pblic&,:rp'ffi$er as and when h4:;&:.%yr * ' 4 :* .,>/ required; $..$a r.,2k7ji.dF - _,li.r_ , W.~X- @ .L-._ .& **$$;;w*&<** _2_ **3** ' _k-._ [; **_+$yi*;_** .$ {f (ii) that the petitio~~8Nd:-lishali **,$I*** "+F ' **_I_** ( _t:_ nht, directly or indirectly make any inducemeK'.?iea~ 6kepromise 1. to any person acquainted with the\factsjbf the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such factsbto $he court or any police E '*,b officer, and i :f>wt+; tk : ,*. ;, ib ..-;gJ:'. ..';a'; ," -'> y*b.$ *l+>$>j:; ;Tv A"., < * _h_ *&. * ,.$ ,% rr" 9qr:l , ,,es (iii) that the petitioner. "- No3 rw 'sa~l'%"bt'leave _ d *- , . India without previous permiss!onot: ;.I: :. .khe.'cbur;t.r: ." i. \ i!' %::: >'fC PC;

¶18

rw-ua rnr
y-4d- , a
-, f". Ls(NAREM~RA' SINGH DHADDHA),J

Pappu@Ajit S/O Lilaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pappu@Ajit S/O Lilaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murari Lal Darji S/O Shri Bajarang Lal B/C Darji Vs State of Rajasthan

Kali Devi W/O Ramphool B/C Bairwa Vs State of Rajasthan

Arjun Singh Yadav S/O Vishambhar Dayal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ram Babu S/O Shri Ghisa Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikas@Vikki S/O Mahaveer Singh S/O Mahaveer Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Alimuddin@Kallu S/O Bashir Mohammad Vs State of Rajasthan