The High Court allowed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for the accused petitioner falsely implicated in an excise case, releasing him subject to trial court satisfaction.
The accused petitioner be released on bail in FIR No. 103/2020 subject to satisfaction of the learned trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5078/2020
Videshi Mehto S/o Nanipat, aged about 60 years, r/o Fajru Colony, Bhudli, Police Station Chaupanki District Alwar (Raj.) (At present confined in Sub Jail Kishangarhbas District Alwar)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan (through video conferencing) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Order
22/05/2020
[CRLMB-5078/2020]
(2 of 2)
(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J
.db/28
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused petitioner is eligible for regular bail in the pending trial.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Videshi Mehto S/o Nanipat
State Of Rajasthan through PP
Manoj Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
