Jagram S/O Ramsahai B/C Meena v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a bail application under Section 438 CrPC regarding FIR under Section 376 IPC, despite petitioner's claim of compromise, the court noted the serious allegations corroborated by the prosecutrix's statement under Section 164 CrPC. The court held no case for pre-arrest bail and rejected the application.
What did the court decide?
bail application rejected
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3700/2020
Jagram S/o Ramsahai, R/o Dhai Wala Dhani Village Digo, PS Lalsot District Dausa (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena (through video conferencing) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Order
21/05/2020
- This Criminal Misc. Bail Application has been brought under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with F.I.R. No. 48/2020 registered with Police Station Lalsot District Dausa, for the offence punishable under Section 376 of IPC.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether pre-arrest bail can be granted under Section 438 CrPC when the prosecution case involves serious allegations under a non-compoundable offence and the prosecutrix has recorded a statement corro
Whether the alleged compromise in a non-compoundable offence under Section 376 IPC makes out a case for pre-arrest bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jagram
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
Coram
Manoj Kumar Vyas
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/3700/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court