Rahul v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur allowed a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner alleged false implication, and the court accepted the bail prayer, ordering release upon furnishing a personal bond with sureties.
What did the court decide?
Accused released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each to the trial court.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2027/2020
Rahul S/o Shri Baluram Gurjar, Aged About 19 Years, Bhalota Ki Khedi, House No. 175 Sector H Azad Nagar, Police Station Pratapnagar, Bhilwara. (At Present Lodged In District Jail Chittorgarh).
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramesh Purohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
13/02/2020
The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.216/2019, P.S. Rashmi, District Chittorgarh, for the offences under Sections 342,323,304/34 IPC.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with offences under Sections 342, 323, and 304/34 IPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rahul S/o Shri Baluram Gurjar
- respondent
State
Coram
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/2027/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court