Amar Singh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court allowed two separate bail applications filed by co-accused under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in rape and abduction cases. Petitioners were released on personal bonds with sureties subject to appearance before the trial court.
What did the court decide?
Petitioners released on bail with personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, conditioned to appear before the trial court.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1690/2020
Gopal Singh S/o Shri Udaiveer Singh, Aged About 27 Years, By Caste Chandel Rajput, Resident Of House No. 2-E-162, Segwa Housing Board, Chittorgarh Sadar Police Station, Chittorgarh, District Chittorgarh, Presently Resident Of Behind FCI Godown, Chanderia Police Station, Chanderia District Chittorgarh. (Lodged In District Jail, Chittorgarh).
----Petitioner
State, Through Pp
Versus ----Respondent
&
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1363/2020
Amar Singh S/o Sh. Udaiveer Singh, Aged About 21 Years, B/c Chandel Rajput, R/o House No. 2-E-162, Segwa Housing Board, Chittorgarh Sadar Police Station, Chittorgarh, District Chittorgarh. (Lodged In District Jail, Chittorgarh).
----Petitioner Versus State, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh Shaktawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail applications filed by petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with IPC and POCSO offences deserve acceptance.
Whether the petitioners should be released on bail despite being booked for serious offences including rape and abduction.
Whether conditions of personal bond with sureties are appropriate for the release of petitioners.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gopal Singh
- petitioner
Amar Singh
- respondent
State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/1363/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court