Chuna Ram v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Rajasthan granted bail to the petitioner underSection 439 of Cr.P.C., holding his case identical to a co-accused already released on bail. The petitioner was ordered to furnish a personal bond and sureties before the trial court.
What did the court decide?
Accused released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each before the trial court.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S. B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 380/2020
Chuna Ram S/o Deepa Ram, Aged About 40 Years, By Caste Jat, Resident of Village Lakdasar, P.S. Bakhasar Dist. Barmer. (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Barmer)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. R.J. Punia |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi,P.P. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
10/01/2020
The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with FIR No. 55/2019, Police Station Bakhasar, District Barmer for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 365, 342, 354, 323, 379 & 427 of I.P.C.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner who is co-accused with a person already granted bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Chuna Ram S/o Deepa Ram
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
Vinit Kumar Mathur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/380/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court