Allowed

Subhash @ Ramkishor v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Jan 2020CRLMB/253/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the court allowed the bail of the petitioner, Subhash @ Ramkishor, who was detained in connection with FIR No.345/2019 for offences under various IPC sections, noting that co-accused had already been granted bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner arrested in connection with FIR No.345/2019 to be released on bail on personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Subhash @ Ramkishor Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 253/2020

¶3

Subhash @ Ramkishor S/o Sh. Ram Swaroop, Aged About 23 Years, B/c Bishnoi, R/o Gattu, Teh. And P.s. Nokha Dist. Bikaner (Raj.). (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Bikaner).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Gill For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶10

Order

¶11

09/01/2020

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.345/2019, P.S. Nokha, for the offences under Sections 308, 325, 341, 323, 143 of IPC.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

¶14

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the coaccused Rajendra, Prem Ratan, Kalu Ram have already been granted bail by this Court vide orders dated 17.12.2019, 25.11.2019 and 25.11.2019 and the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable from the case of the co-accused who have already been released on bail by this Court.

¶15

The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application but he is unable to distinguish the case of the present petitioner

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-253/2020]

¶18

vis-a-vis the case of the co-accused persons who have been enlarged on bail.

¶19

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced and considering the fact that the case of the present petitioner is identical to coaccused aforesaid who have been enlarged on bail by this Court, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is also entitled for the grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶20

Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Subhash @ Ramkishor S/o Ram Swaroop arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.345/2019, P.S. Nokha, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees: Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶22

65-praveen/-

Subhash @ Ramkishor v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subhash @ Ramkishor v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surja Ram Vs State

Ramchandra Vs State

Manful Singh @ Manful Vs State

Mohan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajesh @ Raju Vs State of Rajasthan

Suresh Ram Vs State