Allowed

Amar Singh @ Monu Jat S/O Lilu Jat v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC21 May 2020CRLMB/5116/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Jaipur allowed bail in a criminal matter. The court held it just and expedient to enlarge the accused on bail considering the case involved no injury, no recovery of arms, and allegations of false imposition of Section 307 IPC, subject to trial court satisfaction.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners admitted to regular bail subject to satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

Amar Singh @ Monu Jat S/O Lilu Jat Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5116/2020

¶3

Amar Singh @ Monu Jat S/o Lilu Jat, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Nangal Bawala Police Station Tatarpur Distt. Alwar Raj. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar)

¶4

Dharmendar Choudhary S/o Girraj Prasad Jat, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Nangal Bawala Police Station Tatarpur Distt. Alwar Raj. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar)

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pallav Choudhary (through jitsi meet) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Agarwal, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

21/05/2020

¶13

This Criminal Misc. Bail Application has been brought under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking regular bail in connection with FIR No.66/2020 registered at Police Station Tatarpur, District Bhiwadi for offence under Sections 332, 353, 307, 201 IPC and Section 3/25 Arms Act.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner through Jitsi Meet. It has been contended that this is a case of no injury. No recovery of arms has been made from the possession of the accusedpetitioner. Section 307 IPC has been falsely imposed upon by the petitioner in this case. Hence, they may be granted benefit of bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application

¶15

and submitted the factual report of the case. As per the factual

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-5116/2020]

¶18

report offence under Sections 332, 353, 307, 201 IPC and Section

¶19

3/25 of Arms Act has been committed by the petitioner.

¶20

I have considered the rival contentions.

¶21

On consideration of arguments/submissions of both the parties, perusal of the material on record and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that this is a case of no injury, this Court deems it just and expedient to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. Hence, accused-petitioner be admitted to regular bail subject to

¶22

satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

¶23

(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J

¶24

Arun/51

Amar Singh @ Monu Jat S/O Lilu Jat v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amar Singh @ Monu Jat S/O Lilu Jat v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anaul Ansari S/O Shri Amid Miya B/C Muslim Vs State of Rajasthan

Vimal Varman S/O Kamal Varman B/C Varman Vs State of Rajasthan

Krishna W/O Mahendra B/C Brahmin Vs State of Rajasthan

Bajrang S/O Sukhram Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamlesh S/O Late Shri Lal Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Farukh S/O Hasam Khan Vs State of Rajasthan