Kamlesh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This order grants bail to the accused-petitioner arrested under the Rajasthan Excise Act. The High Court, considering arguments of false implication and length of trial, discharged the petitioner, requiring a personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.
What did the court decide?
Release on bail with personal bond of Rs 50,000 and two sureties of Rs 25,000 each.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 35/2020
Kamlesh S/o Ramswroop Prajapat, Aged About 44 Years, R/o.125, Central Area, Reti Stand, Near Aawrimata Temple, Police Station Hiranmagri, Udaipur. (Presently Lodged At Central Jail Udaipur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through P.p.
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. PankajKumar Gupta |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
03/01/2020
The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.214/2018, Police Station Rishabdev, District Udaipur, for the offences under Sections 19/54, 57 and 54A of the Rajasthan Excise Act.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail given false implication and long anticipated trial duration.
The propriety of the court to grant bail pending trial on personal bond with two sureties.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kamlesh S/o Ramswroop Prajapat
- respondent
State
Coram
Vinit Kumar Mathur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/35/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court