Sarjeet v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed the bail application of the petitioner arrested under various IPC and POCSO provisions. The court held that the allegation of rape was against another accused (Ravi) and not the petitioner, and allowed bail subject to a bond and sureties.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner released on bail subject to a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15771/2019
Sarjeet S/o Ramkumar, Aged About 32 Years, B/c Meghwal, R/o Dungersinghpura, Tehsil Lalgarh, Dist. Sriganganagar. (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Hanumangarh Since 08-102019)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. SuryadeepBishnoi |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Sharwan Kumar Bishnoi,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
03/01/2020
The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.253/2019, Police Station Goluwala, District Hanumangarh for the offences under Sections 363, 366-A, 344, 376(2)(n), 120-B IPC and Section 5(L)/6 read with Section 16/17 of POCSO Act.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail application of the accused alleged of rape against another person and not against him deserves to be allowed.
Whether the petitioner can be released on bail subject to furnishing a personal bond and sureties.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sarjeet S/o Ramkumar
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
Vinit Kumar Mathur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/15771/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court