The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur dismissed an unpressed bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., granting the petitioner liberty to file a fresh application after recording statements.
The bail application was dismissed as not pressed, but liberty was granted to file a fresh application after recording statements.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3180/2020
Ramjan @ Vickky S/o Shri Mangi Khan, Aged About 22 Years, By Caste Chhimpa (Musalman), R/o 17 M.l. Pathanwala, Presently Resident Of Near Kushwaha Kirana Store, Riico, Police Station Sadar, Tehsil And Dist. Sri Ganganagar (Raj.). (At Present Lodged At Central Jail, Sri Ganganagar)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Raj., Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.S. Bhaleria For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Joshi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Judgment / Order
02/07/2020
Learned counsel for the petitioner, without arguing the matter on merits, has submitted that he does not want to press this criminal misc. bail application, however, seeks liberty to file fresh bail application after recording of statements of prosecutrix.
Accordingly, this criminal misc. bail application preferred by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty as prayed for.
(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J
17-amit/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a bail application not pressed by the counsel can still be admitted or must be dismissed as withdrawn?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramjan @ Vickky
State of Raj.
DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
