The High Court revoked an order granting interim bail in a criminal case after the petitioner failed to satisfy conditions, setting the terms for immediate bail allowance.
Revocation of interim bail; directed payment of Rs. 50,000 bond money within four months for immediate bail allowance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqj
vafdr nk;ek iq= jktsUnz izlkn [kVhd] tkfr [kVhd] fuoklh exuiqjk] iqfyl Fkkuk [kkVw';ke th] rglhy nkarkjkex<+] ftyk lhdj
&&izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr &% cuke %&
jktLFkku jkT; tfj, yksd vfHk;kstd &&&vizkFkhZ
vkns'k fnukad%& 19-05-2020
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh izdk'k xqIrk
mifLFkr%&
Jh vjfoUn dqekj pkoyk] vf/koDrk okLrs izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ¼tfj;s oh-lh-½ Jh vrqy 'kekZ ] fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd A
U;k;ky; }kjk %&
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr vafdr nk;ek }kjk ;g tekur vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk mls iqfyl Fkkuk jhaxl] ftyk lhdj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 439@2019] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 363] 366] 379] 120 ch- Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
cgl lquh xbZ A
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks izdj.k esa >waBk Qalk;k x;k gS] og yEcs le; ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gS] ekeys esa vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gS] izdj.k dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izdj.k esa vfHk;ksD=h fiz;adk 'kekZ }kjk Lo;a o izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks lqj{kk iznku fd, tkus gsrq ,dyihB nkf.Md fofo/k ;kfpdk la[;k 6105@2019 U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dh xbZ] tks Lohdkj dh xbZ Fkh A mudk ;g Hkh dFku
2
gS fd vfHk;ksD=h o izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr nksuks o;Ld gSa A vr% bu rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa izkFkhZ dks tekur ij NksM+k tkos A
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k A
nksuksa i{kksa ds vf/koDrkx.k }kjk j[ks x, rdkZs o izdj.k ds leLr rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks nf"Vxr j[krs gq, o fo’ks"k :i ls bl rF; dks nf"Vxr j[krs gq, fd vfHk;ksD=h fiz;adk 'kekZ }kjk U;k;ky; ls Lo;a o izkFkhZ@ vfHk;qDr dh lqj{kk pkgh xbZ gS] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vafre jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% ;g tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼v{kjs :i;s ipkl gtkj ek=½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= bl vk'k; dk izLrqr dj ns fd og izdj.k ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rkjh[k is'kh ij mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk rks izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr vafdr nk;ek iq= jktsUnz izlkn dks iqfyl Fkkuk jhaxl ftyk lhdj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 439@2019 ds ekeys esa ¼;fn og vU; fdlh izdj.k esa oakfNr u gks rks½ vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkos A lkFk gh ;g Hkh vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr 25]000&25]000@& :i;s dh nks lqn<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka ykWd Mkmu vkns'k izR;kgr gksus ds ckn nks lIrkg dh vof/k esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr djsxk A
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr }kjk mijksDrkuqlkj nks izfrHkwfr;ka fuf'pr~ le;kof/k esa izLrqr ugha fd, tkus dh fLFkfr esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; fof/kuqlkj dk;Zokgh djus gsrq Lora= gksxh A
¼U;k0 izdk'k xqIrk½
_f"kds'k lksuh@03
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner was granted interim bail on payment of bond money due to being physically weak.
Whether orders for payment of bail money should be executed against the petitioner due to his physical weak condition.
Whether the petitioner should pay bond money for interim bail or not.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Jh vjfoUn dqekj pkoyk
Jh vrqy 'kekZ
Jh izdk'k xqIrk
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
