Allowed

Shri Ramniwas@Bhagwandas B/C Julawah (Chamar) v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 May 2020CRLMB/2650/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a cheating case, ordering release upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties within two weeks after withdrawal of lockdown, noting co-accused were already enlarged.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail subject to personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each before trial court within two weeks after lockdown withdrawal.

Shri Ramniwas@Bhagwandas B/C Julawah (Chamar) Vs… — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2650/2020

¶3

Shri Ramniwas@bhagwandas B/c Julawah (Chamar), R/o Vill. Badhani Tehsil Jhajjar Dist. Jhajjar Hariyaana At Present Plot No 300 Akrol Dwarka South Ps Dwaka South West Delhi (Presently Confined In J.C. Jaipur)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narendra Mewara (through video Conferencing) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Fateh Ram Meena, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA

¶10

Order

¶11

18/05/2020

¶12

This bail application has been filed under Section 439 CrPC seeking regular bail in FIR No. 618/2019 registered at Police Station Muhana, Jaipur South for the offence under Sections 420, 406 IPC.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 21.10.2019. He further submits that co-accused Suman and Aman as also Ravin @ Robin have been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 4.2.2020 in S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 88/2020 and S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 830/2020 respectively. He further submits that the alleged offence is triable

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-2650/2020]

¶17

by a Judicial Magistrate, First Class. He further submits that after the completion of investigation, challan has already been filed and the conclusion of trial is likely to take long time. The petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this matter. Hence, he may be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Learned PP appearing for the State has opposed the same.

¶19

Considering the material on record, submissions of learned counsel for both the parties as also taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Therefore, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that the accused petitioner Shri Ramniwas @ Bhagwandas S/o Ram Kishan be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each before the trial court, subject to its satisfaction, within two weeks after withdrawal of the order of lock-down.

¶21

If the aforesaid two sureties, as directed above, are not furnished by the petitioner within the aforesaid period, Court below would be free to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law.

¶22

(PRAKASH GUPTA),J

¶23

DK/9

Shri Ramniwas@Bhagwandas B/C Julawah (Chamar) v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Ramniwas@Bhagwandas B/C Julawah (Chamar) v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyam Lal and Anr. Vs Ajmat Singh Thr Lrs

Ramesh Chand Agarwal Vs Mahendra Kumar Agarwal and Ors.

Jaswant Singh Meel Vs Ramniwas and Ors.

Iqbal S/O Amaru B/C Mev Vs State of Rajasthan

Meena Sahu W/O Mr. Sitaram Sahu Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramniwas@Bhagwandas B/C Julawah (Chamar) Vs State of Rajasthan